Sun 12 Dec

Assange: ‘drop the charges’ is wrong

I’ve been too busy to follow much of the storm over Wikileaks and Julian Assange’s arrest (except for occasionally whingeing that it knocked the occupation & protest movement off the top item on the Guardian site).

But last night I saw this – a letter of support for Assange from such luminaries of bonkers leftism as John Pilger and Craig Murray. Worse, signatories include Lindsey German and Salma Yaqoob, both self-proclaimed feminists, or at least supposedly involved in women’s rights campaigning.

What’s wrong with the letter isn’t clear until the end. Pretty much all socialists can agree with the first section, and should. But then we get to:

We demand his immediate release, the dropping of all charges, and an end to the censorship of WikiLeaks.

My first thought: heaven help any woman who is raped by a famous leftist. Or anyone famous leftists like. Echoes of Roman Polanski here or, perhaps more fittingly, Gerry Healy.

Let’s be clear. You can believe Assange is innocent. You can believe it might be a put-up job by his enemies. You can talk about his potential extradition to the US, and what that might mean for whistleblowers. You can, and should, make the point that it’s kinda strange that Interpol only give a fuck about rape when the alleged rapist is a thorn in the side of pretty much every government, an international irritant.

What you cannot do, and claim to be a feminist, or a supporter of women’s liberation, or even a left-winger of any stripe, is call for charges to be dropped. We argue all the time that rape should be taken more seriously by the cops, the courts and the politicians. Dropping that as soon as someone you like is accused of rape is a betrayal, and one that burns coming from such high-profile media lefties.

It’s suspiciously good timing. But while we must investigate and expose any unfair or extra-legal decisions during it, Julian Assange must face due process.

1 Comment »

  1. [...] written about the Guardian letter calling for all charges to be dropped against Assange. You might have seen the set of Youtube [...]

    Pingback by zetkin « notebook — Wed 18 May @ 9:19 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

When men start using language that posits women as objects in order to talk about objectification, it’s not just a gross elision of female agency. It’s a shameless appropriation and a mirror of the way less ‘feminist’ men talk about women.

Call things by their proper names

 

Lindsey German is on the side of taking rape seriously here because Strauss-Kahn is of the big bad IMF and PS are a centre-left party, not America-kicking, conspiracy-busting internet cowboys.

Strauss-Kahn v. Assange

 

The BBC have released an internal police briefing for the education protests of December 8 & 9 last year. Here are some hilarious excerpts, with translation for those fortunate enough not to have had a run-in with the boys in blue recently.

Intelligence is limited

 

Feminists must oppose ‘sexualisation’ being used by conservatives to bolster ideas of the innocence (read: non-sexuality) of teenagers, frequently used to deny them sex education and sexualities.

Don’t get in bed with the Mothers’ Union

 

Banks aren’t like Topshop. No one ‘needs’, on a fundamental, day-to-day, life-sustaining level to go buy some jeans in Oxford Street. But we’re forced to rely on banks, and, the worse off we are, on the physical spaces of highstreet branches

The problem with ‘bail-ins’